<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Memorable Fancy &#187; publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erikmarshall.net/blog/tag/publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erikmarshall.net</link>
	<description>Erik Marshall&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Open Access</title>
		<link>http://www.erikmarshall.net/blog/open-access/</link>
		<comments>http://www.erikmarshall.net/blog/open-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erikmarshall.net/blog/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if just the blogs and sites I read, or if there really is a strong movement toward open-access, online journals. IHE had an article a few days ago about a paper journal that has gone online. The article says that the site has had 20,000 visitors vs hundreds of subscribers, but I <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.erikmarshall.net/blog/open-access/">Open Access</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if just the blogs and sites I read, or if there really is a strong movement toward open-access, online journals. <a href="http://insidehighered.com/news/2008/02/28/open">IHE had an article a few days ago</a> about a paper journal that has gone online. The article says that the site has had 20,000 visitors vs hundreds of subscribers, but I wonder how that number translates to actual readers. I  imagine a lot of poeple are going there just because of the buzz it has received. That said, though, it is a good move, and I don&#8217;t understand why more journals don&#8217;t do this. Many argue that the costs would be lower (although there is some debate about that in the comments section of the aritcle), a journal could publish more articles per issue, and, perhaps most importantly, articles can reach a much larger audience.  See also <a href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/02/06/openaccess_is_t.html#comment-322195">danah boyd&#8217;s call for a boycott of locked-down journals</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erikmarshall.net/blog/open-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

